Formulation of a good research question is a determinant to the quality and contribution of the research. Designing of questions in a study helps to define the scope of inquiry in terms of design, methodology and the like. On the other hand, formulating the research question can be frustrating and challenging for some researchers. As a result, it can deteriorate the quality of research. The study used Google Scholars and Research Gate to perform systematic literature reviews from journal articles. The study used Google Scholar and Research Gate to perform systematic literature review of journal articles. The search was conducted over two months, focusing on keywords including “features of good research questions,” “criteria for developing a good research question,” and “formulation of research question”. Keywords, databases and Boolean operator strategies (OR/AND) were utilised to target the relevant studies. A total of 30 journal articles were initially retrieved from the databases. The inclusion criteria included: (1) Peer-reviewed journals, (2) English language publications, (3) papers discussing criteria to be considered when developing research questions, (4) articles published between 2011 and 2025. Exclusion criteria were based on duplication and articles that did not address how to develop research questions. As a result, 22 articles were excluded, and only 8 articles were used for analysis. Furthermore, thematic analysis was employed to analyse the selected articles. Each article was examined carefully and relevant sections was manually coded. The results indicated that the acronym (FINER) to represent feasibility (F), interesting (I), novel (N), ethical (E), relevant (R) are the most essential criteria that should be taken into consideration while formulating research questions. Other criteria are manageable, appropriate, publishable and systematic. To make meaningful and impactful research, there is a need to consider essential criteria for developing quality questions.
| Published in | American Journal of Applied Scientific Research (Volume 12, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13 |
| Page(s) | 19-24 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Research Question, Feasibility, Interesting, Novel, Ethical, Relevant
| [1] | Alvesson, M., & Sandberg, J. (2024). Constructing research questions: Doing interesting research. SAGE Publications Limited. |
| [2] | Barroga, E., & Matanguihan, G. J. (2022). A practical guide to writing quantitative and qualitative research questions and hypotheses in scholarly articles. Journal of Korean Medical Science, 37(16), e121. |
| [3] | Cypress, B. S. (2015). Qualitative research: The “what,” “why,” “who,” and “how”! Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing, 34(6), 356–361. |
| [4] | Dhir, S. K., & Gupta, P. (2021). Formulation of research questions and composing study outcomes and objectives. Indian Pediatrics, 58(6), 584–588. |
| [5] | Doody, O., & Bailey, M. E. (2016). Setting a research question, aim and objective. Nurse Researcher, 23(4), 19–23. |
| [6] | Fandino, W. (2019). Formulating a good research question: Pearls and pitfalls. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia, 63(8), 611. |
| [7] | Hasan, N., Rana, R. U., Chowdhury, S., Dola, A. J., & Rony, M. K. K. (2021). Ethical considerations in research. Journal of Nursing Research, Patient Safety and Practice, 1(1), 20–25. |
| [8] |
Kishore, J., Vasundhra, S., & Anand, T. (2011). Formulation of a research question. Indian Journal of Medical Specialties.
https://www.ijms.in/articles/2/2/formulation-of-a-research-question.html |
| [9] | Kross, J., & Giust, A. (2019). Elements of research questions in relation to qualitative inquiry. The Qualitative Report. |
| [10] | Majid, U. (2017). Research fundamentals: The research question, outcomes, and background. The Undergraduate Research in Natural and Clinical Science and Technology (URNCST) Journal, 1(2), 1–7. |
| [11] | Mattick, K., Johnston, J., & De La Croix, A. (2018). How to write a good research question. The Clinical Teacher, 15(2), 104–108. |
| [12] | Muszynski, M. (2023). Research questions. San José State University Writing Center. |
| [13] | Willis, L. D. (2023). Formulating the research question and framing the hypothesis. Respiratory Care, 68(8), 1180-1185. |
| [14] | Nassaji, H. (2019). Good research questions. Language Teaching Research, 23(3), 283–286. |
| [15] | Ratan, S., Anand, T., & Ratan, J. (2019). Formulation of research question – Stepwise approach. Journal of Indian Association of Pediatric Surgeons, 24(1), 15. |
| [16] | Covvey, J. R., McClendon, C., & Gionfriddo, M. R. (2023). Back to the basics: Guidance for formulating good research questions. Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy. Advance online publication. |
| [17] | Van Der Waldt, G. (2025). Formulating research questions in social science research. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 21(1). |
APA Style
Mbwaga, T. B., Deogratias, D. H. (2026). Criteria for Crafting Robust Research Questions in Social Science Inquiry. American Journal of Applied Scientific Research, 12(1), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13
ACS Style
Mbwaga, T. B.; Deogratias, D. H. Criteria for Crafting Robust Research Questions in Social Science Inquiry. Am. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2026, 12(1), 19-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13
AMA Style
Mbwaga TB, Deogratias DH. Criteria for Crafting Robust Research Questions in Social Science Inquiry. Am J Appl Sci Res. 2026;12(1):19-24. doi: 10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13,
author = {Teddy Boniface Mbwaga and Deonatus Hatari Deogratias},
title = {Criteria for Crafting Robust Research Questions in Social Science Inquiry},
journal = {American Journal of Applied Scientific Research},
volume = {12},
number = {1},
pages = {19-24},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajasr.20261201.13},
abstract = {Formulation of a good research question is a determinant to the quality and contribution of the research. Designing of questions in a study helps to define the scope of inquiry in terms of design, methodology and the like. On the other hand, formulating the research question can be frustrating and challenging for some researchers. As a result, it can deteriorate the quality of research. The study used Google Scholars and Research Gate to perform systematic literature reviews from journal articles. The study used Google Scholar and Research Gate to perform systematic literature review of journal articles. The search was conducted over two months, focusing on keywords including “features of good research questions,” “criteria for developing a good research question,” and “formulation of research question”. Keywords, databases and Boolean operator strategies (OR/AND) were utilised to target the relevant studies. A total of 30 journal articles were initially retrieved from the databases. The inclusion criteria included: (1) Peer-reviewed journals, (2) English language publications, (3) papers discussing criteria to be considered when developing research questions, (4) articles published between 2011 and 2025. Exclusion criteria were based on duplication and articles that did not address how to develop research questions. As a result, 22 articles were excluded, and only 8 articles were used for analysis. Furthermore, thematic analysis was employed to analyse the selected articles. Each article was examined carefully and relevant sections was manually coded. The results indicated that the acronym (FINER) to represent feasibility (F), interesting (I), novel (N), ethical (E), relevant (R) are the most essential criteria that should be taken into consideration while formulating research questions. Other criteria are manageable, appropriate, publishable and systematic. To make meaningful and impactful research, there is a need to consider essential criteria for developing quality questions.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Criteria for Crafting Robust Research Questions in Social Science Inquiry AU - Teddy Boniface Mbwaga AU - Deonatus Hatari Deogratias Y1 - 2026/02/11 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13 T2 - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research JF - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research JO - American Journal of Applied Scientific Research SP - 19 EP - 24 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2471-9730 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajasr.20261201.13 AB - Formulation of a good research question is a determinant to the quality and contribution of the research. Designing of questions in a study helps to define the scope of inquiry in terms of design, methodology and the like. On the other hand, formulating the research question can be frustrating and challenging for some researchers. As a result, it can deteriorate the quality of research. The study used Google Scholars and Research Gate to perform systematic literature reviews from journal articles. The study used Google Scholar and Research Gate to perform systematic literature review of journal articles. The search was conducted over two months, focusing on keywords including “features of good research questions,” “criteria for developing a good research question,” and “formulation of research question”. Keywords, databases and Boolean operator strategies (OR/AND) were utilised to target the relevant studies. A total of 30 journal articles were initially retrieved from the databases. The inclusion criteria included: (1) Peer-reviewed journals, (2) English language publications, (3) papers discussing criteria to be considered when developing research questions, (4) articles published between 2011 and 2025. Exclusion criteria were based on duplication and articles that did not address how to develop research questions. As a result, 22 articles were excluded, and only 8 articles were used for analysis. Furthermore, thematic analysis was employed to analyse the selected articles. Each article was examined carefully and relevant sections was manually coded. The results indicated that the acronym (FINER) to represent feasibility (F), interesting (I), novel (N), ethical (E), relevant (R) are the most essential criteria that should be taken into consideration while formulating research questions. Other criteria are manageable, appropriate, publishable and systematic. To make meaningful and impactful research, there is a need to consider essential criteria for developing quality questions. VL - 12 IS - 1 ER -
Social Science and Humanity, Mzumbe University, Mbeya, Tanzania
Social Science and Humanity, Mzumbe University, Mbeya, Tanzania
